Lars Øystein Ursin
Bakgrunn og aktiviteter
Jeg arbeider med forskning, formidling og undervisning innen et bredt sett av temaer innen etikk, særlig medisinsk etikk, forskningsetikk, matetikk, klinisk etikk, dyreetikk og empirisk etikk. Les mer på min hjemmeside.
Aktuelle forskningsprosjekter og forskergrupper
-
ETHNA System - Ethics Governance System for RRI in Higher Education, Funding, and Research Centres (EU Horizon 2020)
-
Health, data and the welfare state – debating the data-driven futures in the Nordic Countries
-
Reinforcing the Health Data Infrastructure in Mobility and Assurance through Data Democratization
-
Bio-engineered palladium nanoparticles (BEDPAN)
-
Era-net Coolwine
-
PREMETIKK Det etiske grunnlaget for foreldreavgjørelser ved behandling av ekstremt premature
-
RESET Research Group on the Ethos of Technology
-
MHEtikk Research Group on Medical Ethics
Noen aktuelle oppnevnelser
- Bioreferansegruppa i Helsedirektoratet
- Regional komité for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk (REK-MIDT)
Vitenskapelig, faglig og kunstnerisk arbeid
Et utvalg av nyere tidsskriftspublikasjoner, kunstneriske produksjoner, bok, inklusiv bokdeler og rapport-del. Se alle publikasjoner i databasen
Tidsskriftspublikasjoner
- (2020) «If you give them your little finger, they’ll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy.
- (2019) European Electronic Personal Health Records initiatives and vulnerable migrants: A need for greater ethical, legal and social safeguards. Developing World Bioethics.
- (2019) Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research. PLOS ONE. vol. 14 (9).
- (2019) Are Requirements to Deposit Data in Research Repositories Compatible With the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation?. Annals of Internal Medicine. vol. 170 (5).
- (2019) Being Polite: Why Biobank Consent Comprehension is Neither a Requirement nor an Aspiration. American Journal of Bioethics.
- (2019) Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?. American Journal of Bioethics. vol. 19 (3).
- (2019) Withholding Versus Withdrawing Treatment: Why Medical Guidelines Should Omit “Theoretical Equivalence”. American Journal of Bioethics. vol. 19 (6).
- (2019) Protect us from ourselves: Balancing the parental instinct of saving. Nursing Ethics.
- (2018) Justified by what? Three ways to provide an ethical basis for neonatal policies. Pediatrics. vol. 142.
- (2018) Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research. Journal of Medical Ethics. vol. 44 (10).
- (2018) In the best interest of the. . .parents: Norwegian health personnel on the proper role of parents in neonatal decision-making. Pediatrics. vol. 142.
- (2016) The Ethics of the Meat Paradox. Environmental Ethics. vol. 38 (2).
- (2016) Think Global, Buy National: CSR, Cooperatives and Consumer Concerns in the Norwegian Food Value Chain. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. vol. 29 (3).
- (2013) We're not in it for the money - lay people's moral intuitions on commercial use of 'their' biobank. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. vol. 16 (2).
- (2012) Peeking into the black box of privacy : biobank participants on the importance of recognition. Norsk Epidemiologi. vol. 21 (2).
- (2010) Biobank research and the welfare state project: the HUNT story. Critical Public Health. vol. 20 (4).
- (2010) Das persönliche Genom: Abschied von Privatheit und Zustimmung in der Biobankforschung?. Berliner Debatte INITIAL: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaflichen Diskurs. vol. 21 (4).
- (2010) Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context. HEC Forum. vol. 22 (3).
- (2009) Personal autonomy and informed consent. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. vol. 12 (1).
- (2008) Biobank research and the right to privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. vol. 29 (4).