course-details-portlet

PED8012 - Sosial konstruksjon: teori og praksis m/paper

Om emnet

Vurderingsordning

Vurderingsordning: Oppgave
Karakter: Bestått/Ikke bestått

Vurderingsform Vekting Varighet Hjelpemidler Delkarakter
Oppgave 100/100

Faglig innhold

Social constructionist ideas have been increasingly used to inform practice as well as inquiry. These ideas draw on a relational paradigm, which emphasizes the meaning-making process where interactions, as opposed to cognitive/mental processes, become the focus of concern. By examining what people do together, we will explore the ways in which our realities are created. Thus, our focus will be centered on relational processes, interactions, language and embodied practices. Additionally, focus will be on the practical application of constructionist ideas in a variety of contexts, such as therapy, organizations, healthcare, communities, and education

Læringsutbytte

Students are able to articulate the different assumptions that guide research within a constructionist perspective.

Students are able to assess the applicability and use of social constructionist practice in counseling, education, therapy and organizational development

Students can draw up relevant research questions within the field of social construction and identify appropriate methods

Læringsformer og aktiviteter

Lectures and seminars

Obligatoriske aktiviteter

  • Oblogatorisk deltakelse i undervisning

Mer om vurdering

Paper: 12-15 pages. The research questions of the paper must be within the frame of the course and should relate to some of the course literature. Paper to be sent to Ottar Ness, ottar.ness@ntnu.no

Spesielle vilkår

Vurderingsmelding krever godkjent undervisningsmelding samme semester. Obligatorisk aktivitet fra tidligere semester kan godkjennes av instituttet.

Kursmateriell

Reading list: Social constructionist theory and practice Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1990). Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-64. Frank, A. (2005). What Is Dialogical Research, and Why Should We Do It? Qualitative Health Research, 15, 964-974. http://qhr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/15/7/964 Gergen, K.J. (2011). Relational Being. London: Oxford. Gergen, K. J., & Ness, O. (2016). Therapeutic Practice as Social Construction. In M. O´Reilly & J. Lester (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health: Discourse and Conversation Studies (pp. 502-519). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. Katz, A. & Shotter, J. (1999). Social Poetics as a Relational Practice: Creating Resourceful Communities. Paper presented at Social Construction and Relational Practices conference, Durham, NH. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds/js.ak.SOCPOENTS.htm McNamee, S. (200?). Relational practices in Education: Teaching as conversation. In H. Anderson & D. Gehart, (eds.), Collaborative therapy (pp. 313-336) McNamee, S. (2004). Promiscuity in family therapy. Journal of family therapy, 26, 224-244. McNamee, S. (2015). Ethics as Discursive Potential. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2015, 36, 419–433 McNamee, S. (2010). Research as social construction. Transformative Inquiry. Sau. & Transf. Soc., Florianópolis, 1(1), 9-19. Ness, O., & Strong, T. (2014). Relational consciousness and the conversational practices of Johnella Bird. Journal of Family Therapy, 36(1), 81-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00567.x. Sampson, E.E. (1993). Celebrating the Other: A Dialogic Account of Human Nature. Colorado: Westview Press, Chapter 3: Possessive Individualism and the Self-Contained Ideal, pp. 31-41. Sampson, E.E. (1993). Celebrating the Other: A Dialogic Account of Human Nature. Colorado: Westview Press, Chapter 7: “Celebrating the Other: The Dialogic Turn” pp. 97-110. Seikkula, J., Arnkil, T.E., & Erikson, E. (2003). Postmodern Society and Social Networks: Open and Anticipation Dialogues in Network Meetings. Family Process, 42, 2, 185-203. Simon, G., & Chard, A. (2014). Systemic Inquiry: Innovations in Reflexive Practice Research. Farnhill, UK: Everything Connected Press. Stewart, J. & Zediker, K. (2002). Dialogue as Tensional, Ethical Practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65 (2/3), 224-242. Suggested readings Bochner, A. and Ellis, C. (1995). Telling and Living: Narrative Co-Construction and the Practices of Interpersonal Relationships. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social Approaches to Communication. New York: Guilford Press, 201-213. Bruffee, K. (1999). Education as Conversation. In Collaborative Learning. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism, History of the Human Sciences, 8, 25-49. Gergen, K.J. (2007). Relativism, Religion and Relational Being. Common Knowledge, 13, 2- 3, 362-378. Gergen, K.J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. (2001). Toward Transformative Dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 7/8, 679-707. Gergen, K. & McNamee, S. (2000). From Disordered to Generative Dialogues. In R. Neimeyer & J.D. Raskin (Eds.), The Construction of Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 333-349. Gergen, K., Hoffman, L., & Anderson, H. (1995). Is Diagnosis a Disaster: A Trialogue. In F. Kaslow (Ed.), Handbook of Relational Diagnosis. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Katz, A., Conant, L., Inui, T., Baron, D. & Bor, D. (2000). A Council of Elders: Creating a Multi-Voiced Dialogue in a Community of Care. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 6, 851-860. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds/Elderscouncil.htm McNamee, S. (2008). Transformative Dialogue: Coordinating Conflicting Moralities. Lindberg Lecture, College of Liberal Arts, University of New Hampshire. http://www.unh.edu/liberal-arts/faculty/lindberg_award.html McNamee, S. (2004). The Social Construction of Disorders: From Pathology to Potential. In J.D. Raskin & S.K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in Meaning. New York: Pace University Press, 143-168. McNamee, S. & Gergen, K.J. (1999). Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Chapters 1-2, pp. 3-48. Paré, D.A. (2002). Discursive wisdom: Reflections on ethics and therapeutic knowledge. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 7, 30-52. Paré, D.A., & Lysack, M. (2004). The oak and the willow: From monologue to dialogue in the scaffolding of therapeutic conversations. Journal of Systemic Therapies 23(1), pp. 6-20. Roth, S., Chasin, L., Chasin, R., Becker, C., & Herzig, M. (1992). From Debate to Dialogue: A Facilitating Role for Family Therapists in the Public Forum. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Australia, vol. 2: 41-48. http://www.publicconversations.org/pcp/resources/resourcedetail.asp?refid=87 Sharf, B., & Vanderford, M.L. (2003). Illness Narratives and the Social Construction of Health. In T. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K.I. Miller, and R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of Health Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 9-34.

Studiepoengreduksjon

Emnekode Reduksjon Fra Til
PED8013 2.5 01.09.2019
Flere sider om emnet

Ingen

Fakta om emnet

Versjon: 1
Studiepoeng:  5.0 SP
Studienivå: Doktorgrads nivå

Undervisning

Termin nr.: 1
Undervises:  HØST 2019

Undervisningsspråk: Engelsk

Sted: Trondheim

Fagområde(r)
  • Pedagogikk
  • Rådgivning
  • Samfunnsvitenskapelige fag
Kontaktinformasjon
Emneansvarlig/koordinator:

Ansvarlig enhet
Institutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring

Telefon:

Eksamensinfo

Vurderingsordning: Oppgave

Termin Statuskode Vurderings-form Vekting Hjelpemidler Dato Tid Digital eksamen Rom *
Høst ORD Oppgave 100/100
Rom Bygning Antall kandidater
  • * Skriftlig eksamen plasseres på rom 3 dager før eksamensdato.
Hvis mer enn ett rom er oppgitt, finner du ditt rom på Studentweb.
Eksamensinfo

For mer info om oppmelding til og gjennomføring av eksamen, se "Innsida - Eksamen"

Mer om eksamen ved NTNU