On Competition-driven Teaching of Multidisciplinary Engineering Education: Implementation cases at University of Stavanger

Abstract

This article will reflect the experience gained on problem-based learning (PBL) projects implemented in the last six years at University of Stavanger (UiS). The PBL projects were implemented by establishing two ”student-driven” student organizations, ION Racing and UiS Subsea, that design and construct Formula 1 style single seat racecar and underwater robot respectively. The student organizations simulate an engineering company that receives order from a client and deliver the product according to the customer specifications. The fundamental objective of the projects is to stimulate the learning process in the engineering profession in a multidisciplinary environment, gain knowledge within science and engineering, and develop skills in use of advanced tools and techniques. The article highlights the student competition environment briefly and presents the result of a survey conducted on students currently participating in the PBL project. The survey result clearly indicates that the students’ preference for learning is on project work in a team and hands-on exercises including laboratory works.

References

[1]. Felder, R.M., and Silverman, L.K. (1988) Learning and teaching style in engineering education, Engineering Education, 78(7), pp. 674–681. http://www.academia.edu/download/31039406/LS-1988.pdf

[2]. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004) Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), pp. 235 - 266.

[3]. Bell, S. (2010) Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future, The clearing house: Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), pp. 39 – 43. Doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415.

[4]. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., and Bunting, C. F. (2011) Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), pp. 253-280.
doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x

[5]. Mills, J. E., and Treagust, D. F. (2003) Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?, Australian journal of education, 3(2), pp. 2 – 16. http://www.aaee.com.au/ journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf.

[6]. Allen, D.E., Donham, R.S. Bernhardt, S.A. (2011) Problem-Based Learning, New directions for teaching and learning, No. 128, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Wiley Online Library, doi: 10.1002/tl.465.

[7]. Fink, F.K., (1999) Integration of engineering practice into curriculum - 25 years of experience with problem based learning. In 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 10-13, 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico. http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie99/

[8]. Kjersdam, F. (2004) Tomorrow's engineering education - The Aalborg experiment, European Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), pp. 197-203. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043799408923285

[9]. IMechE home page: http://www.imeche.org/ (Last visited: 2017.09.12).

[10]. MATE home page: http://www.marinetech.org/ (Last visited: 2017.09.12).

[11]. Olsen, E. V., and Lemu, H. G. (2015) Mechanical Testing of Composite Materials for Monocoque Design in Formula Student Car, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 10(1), pp. 1-9. http://www.waset.org/publications/10003140

[12]. Øygarden, B., Bruset, M., Lemu, H.G. (2016), Multibody Dynamics Simulation of ROV Manipulator Designed for Student Competition. In: Advanced Manufacturing and Automation VI. Atlantis Press, pp. 225 – 232.

[13]. Heitmann, G. (1996) Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions, European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), pp. 121-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043799608923395.
Published
2017-11-15
Section
Nordic Journal of STEM Education - Full Papers