Current Issue
No 2 (2019)
Taking issue with sustainable governance involves careful consideration of social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainability, and the interplay of those dimensions in political processes and decision-making. The current issue of Etikk i Praksis contributes to this task by offering analysis of central concepts in the discourse of sustainability, as well as examinations of political and moral issues raised by pressing environmental challenges such as climate change.
Published:
2019-11-24
Leder - Introduction
Artikler - Articles
Åpen del - Open section
Omslag innsider - Cover pages
|
|
SHERPA classified RoMEO green journal Indexed in DOAJ, Web of Science, EbscoHost, Philosopher's Index and Scopus Languages: Norwegian, Swedish, Danish and English ISI/JCR short title: Etikk Praksis |
|
Latest Issue OnlineNr 2 2019
Special Issue on Ethics of Sustainable Governance Most cited articles Mickey Gjerris, Silvia Gaiani Google scholar Web of science
Stellan Welin Google scholar Web of science
Moral and ethical decision-making: A chance for doping prevention in sports?
Marcus Melzer, Anne-Marie Elbe, Ralf Brand Google scholar Web of science Redefining disability: a rejoinder to a critique
Solveig Magnus Reindal Google scholar Web of science
Moral analysis of an economic collapse – an exercise in practical ethics
Vilhjálmur Árnason Google scholar Web of science
Call for submissionsNr 2/2020 Special Issue Deadline for submission: May 5, 2020 The Justice for Others: Arbitrary Law-making in Contemporary Migration Policy Does regulation of migration constitute a blunt case of arbitrary law-making? This is the pressing issue that this special issue seeks to engage with by exploring international migration from the point of view of arbitrary power. When does legitimate state discretion slides into an exercise of arbitrary power? Deciding who may enjoy the right to abode, to stay, to asylum, to citizenship is a key power of the state: A regal prerogative, an act of sovereignty, limited only by deliberately accepted commitments, such as the respect for human rights. This makes migration policy an exceptionally interesting ground to test the limits of discretion and the forms of arbitrariness. Power can be understood to be of a discretional nature if it acts freely within the boundaries defined by law, whereas arbitrary qualifies discretional power exceeding the limits of law. Further enquiry is needed if we want to know how this hitherto peripheral and surrogated dimension of legal decision-making stretches the leeway of legal officials to the very margin of legality, disclosing the social tension and the power struggle between their agency and the structures that condition and enable it. As arbitrariness becomes a pressing concern for lawyers, practicians and scholars attempting to grasp the discretionary powers of judicial and administrative authorities, its legal construction, social impact and political consequences must be explored in order to appreciate how central it has become. But arbitrary law-making is yet to garner the attention it deserves. It is not only under-theorized, but also lacks adequate empirical analysis. As of today, there is little or no conversation about arbitrary law-making across disciplines involved with migration, a policy area marked by the recurrent use of discretionary practices in law and practices often conceived to be arbitrary. The special issue aims to bring together practical philosophy, legal theory and social theory in conversation with migration law about the topic of arbitrary law-making in contemporary migration policy. |
||
