Use of psychotropic drugs in homes for the aged in Bergen, Norway: A comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v8i2.453Abstract
ABSTRACT
Study objectives:
Design:
Setting:
Participants:
Main results:
Conclusion:
Key words:
Long term care facilities; psychotropic drugs; non-cognitive symptoms; mental impairmentDuring several years educational programs for nurses and physicians have been carried
out to improve the general care and drug treatment of the elderly, especially with regard to psychotropic
drugs. The anticipated changes in the use of psychotropic drugs have not been fulfilled.
The was a significant increased use of psychotropic drugs from 1985 to 1996, 48% to61% of the residents (p = 0.002). The use of anxiolytics and antidepressants increased significantly (5%
to 14%, p=0.0004 and 12% to 23%, p=0.0005, respectively), while antipsychotics and hypnotics
remained stable (24% on both occasions and 22% and 27%, respectively). The use of anxiolytics and
neuroleptics was associated with anxiety, wandering and aggressive behaviour. Anxiolytics were more
frequently use by mentally unimpaired residents. A substantial number of passive and apathetic
residents were treated inappropriately with psychotropic drugs.
Thirteen representative homes for the aged with a total of 339 residents in 1985 and 286residents in 1996.
All regularly used psychotropic drugs and demographic information were collected from thecase notes. Mental capacity, which was assessed by means of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale
(CDR), and behaviour were registered by a trained nurse.
A point prevalence survey performed on two occasions in 1985 and 1996.To compare the regular use of psychotropic drugs in 1985 and 1996 in homes for theaged in Bergen, Norway and to study the relation between age, gender, mental impairment and certain
behaviour traits and psychotropic drug use.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Norsk Epidemiologi licenses all content of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence. This means, among other things, that anyone is free to copy and distribute the content, as long as they give proper credit to the author(s) and the journal. For further information, see Creative Commons website for human readable or lawyer readable versions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).