The Scandinavian Small-for-Gestational Age (SGA) pregnancy and birth cohort – A source to continual insight into fetal growth restriction and long term physical and neurodevelopmental health in mother and offspring
AbstractHuman in utero growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with an increased risk for perinatal mortality and morbidity
among newborns and infants. To pursue this challenge, a Request For Proposals (RFP) was issued in 1983
by The U.S. Epidemiology and Biometry Research Program at the National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development (NICHD). A consortium was set up at the universities and university hospitals in Trondheim,
Bergen (Norway) and Uppsala (Sweden) and was funded by the NICHD to conduct the Scandinavian Successive
Small-for-Gestational Age (SGA) pregnancy and birth outcome study. The study design included a comprehensive
biobank with maternal and cord serum samples, placental tissue, and a multitude of data collected from
interviews, questionnaires, and clinical examinations.
The SGA cohort study involved 6,354 Caucasian pregnant women in the three study sites who expected their
second or third child from 1986-88. The study women were screened in early second trimester and mothers who
had an increased risk to deliver a smaller than expected newborn were followed in detail through the second half
of pregnancy and at birth. Selected children were screened several times through their first and up to five years
of age. Moreover, a highly selected subgroup in Trondheim has been followed at 14, 19, and 26 years’ age.
Almost thirty years later, we have searched the body of scientific publications that originated from this cohort
study in an attempt to assess if and to what extent the main aims and objectives were achieved and to summarize
the overall outcomes. The SGA cohort has resulted in close to 100 published papers in peer reviewed journals
and some 40 graduate and undergraduate degrees. Risk factors of SGA, like maternal smoking, low prepregnancy
weight and education attainment, and a previous SGA birth outcome were confirmed. Conversely, no
totally new and unknown risk factors were identified. Serial ultrasound measures have enabled a distinction
between SGA with restricted and normal intrauterine growth, and has further indicated that being born SGA is
mainly a problem in combination with IUGR. Further, the consequences of IUGR are more pronounced at
adolescence and young adulthood than at five years of age.
An increased understanding of the pathogenesis of different categories of growth restriction is essential to
recognize and diagnose IUGR properly, and to reduce the perinatal mortality and morbidity from SGA. Moreover,
SGA is a significant predictor at follow-up of the child. An up to date biobank has ensured the quality of data
and biological samples, and has been crucial for the outcome of the entire SGA study. It continues to be a
valuable resource in future research.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Norsk Epidemiologi licenses all content of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence. This means, among other things, that anyone is free to copy and distribute the content, as long as they give proper credit to the author(s) and the journal. For further information, see Creative Commons website for human readable or lawyer readable versions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).