The beauty, logic and limitations of twin studies
AbstractDuring the last fifty years more than 2700 twin studies have been published, examining the etiology of a
high number of traits. Twin studies enable investigation of both genetic and environmental effects, and
thereby also examination of causal factors involved in human traits and disorders. The beauty of twin
studies resides in the potential of studying the unobserved by the logic of a design. The aim of this article is
to outline central theoretical foundations and possible limitations, and to review selected key findings. We
describe the inherent fundamentals of the classic and extended twin designs. The logic of the main analytic
approaches is outlined, and the principles of univariate biometric modelling described. Next, we review
different multivariate models, including the Cholesky, correlated factors, common factor, common pathway
and phenotypic causality models. Additionally, the cotwin-control approach, representing a natural
experimental design, and mimicking a counterfactual situation, is outlined. Central assumptions, threats
and limitations of the twin design are discussed. In particular, we address the issue of missing heritability,
non-random mating, the equal environment assumption and gene-environment correlations. Finally, we
review some selected findings from the field of behavior genetics and twin studies.
Copyright (c) 2016 Espen Røysamb, Kristian Tambs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Norsk Epidemiologi licenses all content of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence. This means, among other things, that anyone is free to copy and distribute the content, as long as they give proper credit to the author(s) and the journal. For further information, see Creative Commons website for human readable or lawyer readable versions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).