Learning to Become a Science Talent
The article focuses on the concept of talent and its enactment in a science talent program. The article investigates how students become a particular kind of knowing subject through their participation in a science talent program at the Mærsk McKinney Science Centre in Denmark. Drawing on concepts from new materialist studies (Latour 1993; Blok & Ellgaard Jensen 2009; Fox & Alldred 2017) the article explores the relationship between the possibilities for distribution that are offered to the participants, and the ways in which the participants respond by centering and decentering within the talent network (Mialet 2008, 2012). The study contributes to our understanding of, how the increased focus on talent development in many national educational systems influences basic preconceptions of what a science student is and how the knowing subject in society should treat science, by looking into the micro-politics of talent development.
Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic subjects: Embodiement and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
Bruun Jensen, C., ‘STS’, in S. Brinkmann and L. Tanggaard 2011, Kvalitative Metoder. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Publishers.
Clark/Keefe, K. 2014. ‘Becoming artist, becoming educated, becoming undone: toward a nomadic perspective of college student identity development’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 27, No, 1, 110-134. Routledge.
Daugbjerg, P.S.; Lindfors, E.; Dal, M.; Henriksen, E.O. and Ottander, C. 2011. Utvikling av naturviten-skapelig talent og kreativitet: et nordisk perspektiv. Nordisk Ministerråd.
Ericsson, K., Krampe, R. and Tesch-Römer, C. 1993. ‘The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance’, in Psychological Review 100(3): 363–406.
Fox, N.J. & Alldred, P. 2017. Sociology and the New Materialism: Theory, Research, Action. Sage.
Freeman, J. 2004. ‘Teaching the Gifted and Talented’, in Education Today 54: 17–21.
Latour, B 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, trans Catherine Porter, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Mialet, H. 2008. L’Entreprise Créatrice, Le rôle des récits, des objets et de l’acteur dans l’invention. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.
Mialet, H. 2012. Hawking Incorporated. Chicago, Ill.: the University of Chicago Press.
Mol, A. 1999. ‘Ontological Politics: A word and some questions.’ The Sociological Review. Volume 47, Issue S1. Pages 74–89
Nissen, P. and Baltzer, K. 2011. Effektundersøgelse af talentklasser. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Children and Education.
Rasmussen, A. & Rasmussen, P. 2015: ‘Conceptions of student talent in the context of talent development’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, 476-495. Routledge.
Rasmussen, J., ‘Undervisningsdifferentiering i enhedsskolen’, in N. Egelund ed., 2010, Undervisningsdifferentiering – Status og fremblik. Copenhagen: Dafolo A/S.
Renzulli, J. S. 1994. Schools for Talent Development: A Practical Plan for Total School Improvement. Mansfield Center, Conn.: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. 1985. The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A Comprehensive Plan for Educational Excellence. Mansfield Center, Conn.: Creative Learning Press.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jesper Stilling Olesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All content in NJSTS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license. This means that anyone is free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the material as they like, provided they follow two provisions:
a) attribution - give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
b) share alike - any remixing, transformation or building upon the material must itself be published under the same license as the original.