Democracy or war? The communication and deliberation of the climate issue online.

Authors

  • Tomas Moe Skjølsvold
  • Marianne Ryghaug
  • Eirik Frøhaug Swensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v3i1.2154

Keywords:

climate communication, scientific deliberation, online communication, scientific democratization, social robustness

Abstract

For years, technology optimists have hoped that the internet might serve as a vehicle for democratization. Meanwhile, many STS-scholars have called for a democratization of scientific practices through increased transparency and inclusion of lay-persons in scientific knowledge production. Many expect this to result in increased scientific quality and more legitimate knowledge claims. In this article, we explore what happens when science related communication moves online. Do climate scientists and climate ‘skeptics’ use the internet to engage lay persons in factual deliberations and debate? Does the rise of the internet as a channel of science communication herald a new, democratic scientific era? Our paper suggests that such claims should be made with caution. Instead we identify two ways that the internet is used by climate scientists. First, it is a tool to fight a cold war with climate skeptics, a dynamic which is hidden from public view. Second, it is a site of education, where ready-made packets of facts should be transported to lay-people to mitigate perceived knowledge deficits. This strategy is mimicked by climate skeptics who attempt to make their communication appear more scientific than the scientists.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer, Martin W. 2009. The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science—Discourse and Comparative Evidence. Science Technology & Society 14 (2):221-240.

Bollen, Kenneth. 1993. Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science:1207-1230.

Booker, Christopher. 2009. Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation. The Telegraph no. 28.

Burchell, Kevin. 2007. Empiricist selves and contingent ‘others’: The performative function of the discourse of scientists working in conditions of controversy. Public Understanding of Science 16 (2):145-162.

Callon, Michel. 1999. The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge. Science Technology & Society 4 (1):81-94.

Cogburn, Derrick L., and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez. 2011. From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign. Journal of Political Marketing 10 (1-2):189-213.

Dahlgren, Peter. 2000. The Internet and the democratization of civic culture. Political Communication 17 (4):335-340.

Demeritt, David. 2006. Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique. Economy and society 35 (3):453-479.

Feldpausch-Parker, Andrea M., Israel D. Parker, and Tarla Rai

Peterson. 2012. “Web-based Public Participation.” In Climate Change

Politics, (eds.) Anabela Carvalho and Tarla Rai Peterson. Amherst,

NY: Cambria Press.

Ferdinand, Peter. 2000. The Internet, democracy and democratization. Democratization 7 (1):1-17.

Funtowicz, Silvio O, and Jerome R Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (7):739-755.

Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies: Sage.

Gilbert, G Nigel. 1984. Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse: CUP Archive.

Grundmann, Reiner. 2013. “Climategate” and The Scientific Ethos. Science, Technology & Human Values 38 (1):67-93.

Haklay, Muki. 2013. “Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation.” In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, (eds.) Daniel Sui, Sarah Elwood and Michael Goodchild, 105-122. Springer Netherlands.

Hessels, Laurens K, and Harro Van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research policy 37 (4):740-760.

Holliman, Richard. 2011. Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism 12 (7):832-846.

Hulme, Mike, and J Ravetz. 2009. ‘Show Your Working’: what ‘ClimateGate’means. BBC News no. 1 (December).

Jönsson, Anna Marie. 2012. “Climate Governance and Virtual Public Spheres.” In Climate Change Politics. Communication and Public Engagement, (eds. Anabela Carvalho and Tarle Rai Peterson. Amhersrt, NY: Cambria Press.

Krauss, Werner, Mike S Schafer, and Hans von Storch. 2012. Introduction: Post-Normal Climate Science. Nature and Culture 7 (2):121-132.

Lahsen, Myanna. 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change 18 (1):204-219.

McAllister, James W. 2012. Climate Science Controversies and the Demand for Access to Empirical Data. Philosophy of Science 79 (5):871-880.

Michael, Mike, and Lynda Birke. 1994. Enrolling the core set: The case of the animal experimentation controversy. Social Studies of Science 24 (1):81-95.

Nerlich, Brigitte. 2010. ’Climategate’: paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values 19 (4):419-442.

Norgaard, Kari Marie. 2011. Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life: MIT Press.

Nowotny, Helga. 2003. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and public policy 30 (3):151-156.

Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty: SciELO Argentina.

Næss, Robert, and Jøran Solli (ed.). 2013. Klimakunnskap og kunnskapsklima: hvordan drives klimatilpasning? Trondheim: Akademika.

Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Pettersen, Lene. 2014. From Mass Production to Mass Collaboration: Institutionalized Hindrances to Social Platforms in the Workplace. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 2 (2):29-40.

Russell, Muir, Geoffrey Boulton, Peter Clarke, David Eyton, and J Norton. 2010. The independent climate change e-mails review.

Ryghaug, Marianne, and Tomas Moe Skjølsvold. 2010. The global warming of climate science: Climategate and the construction of scientific facts. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):287-307.

Ryghaug, Marianne, and Jøran Solli. 2012. The appropriation of the climate change problem among road managers: fighting in the trenches of the real world. Climatic change 114 (3-4):427-440.

Schäfer, Mike S. 2012. Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. Climate Change 3 (6):527-543.

Sharman, Amelia. 2013. Mapping the climate skeptical blogosphere. Paper read at Workshop on Link Discovery (Chicago, Illinois: ACM).

Solli, Jøran, and Marianne Ryghaug. 2014. Assembling climate knowledge. The role of local expertise. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology 2 (2):18-28.

Stilgoe, Jack, Alan Irwin, and Kevin Jones. 2006. “The received wisdom: Opening up expert advice.”

Swenssen, Eirik Frøhaug. 2010. Rammer for handling? Klimaskeptikere i den norske klimadebatten. Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 21 (2).

Tøsse, Sunniva Eikeland. 2013. Aiming for Social or Political Robustness? Media Strategies Among Climate Scientists. Science Communication 35 (1):32-55.

Wynne, Brian. 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, technology, and human values:111-121.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

Issue

Section

Peer-Reviewed Articles