Disability and Bureaucratic Forms of Life

Authors

  • Thomas Abrams

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v3i1.2153

Keywords:

Disability, Bureaucracy, Administrative Forms, Actor-Network Theory, Phenomenology

Abstract

This paper employs a hybrid actor-network theory/phenomenological approach to a frequent bother in the lives of disabled persons: bureaucratic forms. I argue that these forms are key sites where disabled personhood emerges, something I examine through the lens of what philosopher Annemarie Mol calls ‘ontological politics’. To be disabled is to be entered into the bureaucratic form of life. These forms translate human existence into a categorize-able, transportable and combinable object, to be administered through ‘centers of calculation’. Combining Heidegger’s fundamental ontology with Latour’s theory of paperwork, I suggest that these forms represent disability in terms of ‘objective presence’, as a mere pre-existing thing, rather than a human way of being. I conclude with suggestions for further phenomenological research that takes embodied difference as its point of departure. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, T. (2013). Being-Towards-Death and Taxes: Heidegger, Disability, and the Ontological Difference. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 2(1), 28-50.

———. (2014a). Boon or Bust? Heidegger, Disability Aesthetics and the Thalidomide Memorial. Disability & Society, 29(5), 751-762.

———. (2014b). From Homines Inhabiles to Homo Economicus and Back Again: Michel Callon, Distributed Agency and the Ontario Disability Support Program's Employment Supports. Journal of Cultural Economy.

———. (2014c). Flawed by Dasein? Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, and the Personal Experience of Physiotherapy. Human Studies.

———. (2014d). Is Everyone Upright? Erwin Straus' "The Upright Posture" and Disabled Phenomenology. Human Affairs. Forthcoming.

Asdal, K., & Ween, G. (2014). Writing Nature. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 2(1), 4-10.

Barnes, C. (1996). Disability and the Myth of the Independent Researcher. Disability & Society, 11(1), 107-110.

———. (2003). What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on Doing Emancipatory Disability Research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3-17.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". London and New York: Routledge.

Canada. (2011). T2201 Disability Tax Credit Certificate. Ottawa: Canada Revenue Agency.

———. (2012). T2201 Disability Tax Credit Certificate. Ottawa: Canada Revenue Agency.

———. (2013). Medical and Disability-Related Information 2013. Ottawa: Canada Revenue Agency.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Guignon, C. (1990). Philosophy after Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50(4), 649-672.

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

———. (2005). The Cartesian Vision Fulfilled: Analogue Bodies and Digital Minds. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30(2), 153-166.

Haraway, D. (1994). A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59-71.

Heidegger, M. (1992). The Concept of Time (W. McNeil, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

———. (1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.

———. (1993). The Question Concerning Technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings (2nd ed., pp. 307-342). San Francisco: Harper Collins.

Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325-340.

Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology; an introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Juuso, Päivi, Skär, L., Olsson, M., & Söderberg, s. (2011). Living with a double burden: Meanings of pain for women with fibromyalgia. International Journal of Qualitiative Studies of Well-being, 6(3), n.p.

Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands. In H. Kuklick, & E. Long (Eds.), Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present (pp. 1-40). London: JAI Press.

———. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

———. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

———. (2004). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to

Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

Moser, I., & Law, J. (1999). Good Passages, Bad Passages. In J.

Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor-Network Theory and After (pp. 196-219). Oxford: Blackwell.

Oliver, M. (1986). Social Policy and Disability: Some Theoretical Issues. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1(1), 5-17.

———. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. London: MacMillan.

Ontario. (2012). Ontario Disability Support Program Application Package. Ministry of Community and Social Services.

Overgaard, S. (2006). The problem of other minds: Wittgenstein's Phenomenological perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(1), 53-73.

Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability Studies and Phenomenology: the Carnal Politics of Everyday Life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597-610.

Prince, M. J. (2001). Tax Policy as Social Policy: Canadian Tax Assistance for People with Disabilities. Canadian Public Policy, 27(4), 487-501.

Rorty, R. (1993). Heidegger and Wittgenstein on the Reification of Language. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 337-357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schillmeier, M. (2008). Time-Spaces of In/dependence and Dis/ability. Time and Society, 17(2/3), 215-231.

———. (2010). Rethinking Disability: Bodies, Senses, Things. New York: Routledge.

Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.

Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (1997). Defending the Social Model. Disability & Society, 12(2), 293-300.

Smith, D. (1990). The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist

Sociology of Knowlegde. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and Writing Disability Differently: The Textured Life of Embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

———. (2011). The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Titchkosky, T., & Michalko, R. (2012). The Body as The Problem of Individuality: A Phenomenological Disability Studies Approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory: New Directions and Developments (pp. 127-142). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Toombs, S. K. (1995). The Lived Experience of Disability. Human Studies, 18, 9-23.

Wilson, A. (2012). The dys-appearing body: understanding the lived experience of women with fibromylagia. Carleton University, Ottawa.

Winance, M. (2006). Trying out the wheelchair: the mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(1), 52-72.

Wittgenstein, L. (2001a). Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

———. (2001b). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears, & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

Issue

Section

Peer-Reviewed Articles