The Stedegenhet of Nordic STS

  • Henrik Karlstrøm
  • Terje Finstad
Keywords: STS Theory, Nordicness, institutionalisation, stedegenhet

Abstract

The increasing formalization of STS research networks in the Nordic countries prompts a discussion of how research and academic work in the region is constituted – what makes something ‘Nordic’ STS as opposed to just ‘regular’ STS? Similarly, the degree to which international STS theories can be translated into a Nordic institutional context is a matter of importance for assessing the type of work that is being done by Nordic STS researchers. The article provides an overview of STS-related institutions and activities in the Nordic countries, and discusses the diffusion and diffraction of STS theory across
national and institutional barriers.

References

Andersen, T. M., Holmström, B., Honkapohja, S., Korkman, S., Tson, S. H., and Vartiainen, J. 2007. The Nordic Model. Embracing globalization and sharing risks. ETLA B.

Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (ed.), Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? 196–223.

Canclini, N. G. 1995. Hybrid cultures, oblique powers. In Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. 207–263.

Christiansen, N. 2006. The Nordic model of welfare: a historical reappraisal. Museum Tusculanum Press.

Collins, H., and Evans, R. 2008. Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press.

Creager, A., Grandin, K., Wormbs, N., and Widmalm, S. 2004. The science-industry nexus: History, policy, implications.

Dear, P., and Jasanoff, S. 2010. Dismantling boundaries in science and technology studies. Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences, 101(4), 759–74.

Elzinga, A. 1980. “Science Studies” in Sweden. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 181–214.

Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Jantti, M., Bratsberg, B., Røed, K., Raaum, O., Naylor, R., Osterbacka and E., Eriksson, T. 2006. American exceptionalism in a new light: a comparison of intergenerational earnings mobility in the Nordic countries,

Jasanoff, S. 1995. Science at the bar: law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.

Knorr-Cetina, K. 2007. Culture in global knowledge societies:

Latour, B. 1983. Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. J. Mulkay (eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. 141–170.

Latour, B. 2010. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’État. Polity.

Law, J. 2008. On sociology and STS. The Sociological Review, 56 (4):623-649.

Sejersted, F. 2005. Sosialdemokratiets tidsalder. Pax Oslo.

Skoie, H., 2005. Norsk forskningspolitikk i etterkrigstiden. Cappelen Akademisk.

Stengers, I., and Bononno, R. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. University of Minnesota Press.

Sørensen, K. H. 2012. Disciplined Interdisciplinarity? A Brief Account of STS in Norway. Tecnoscienza, 3(1), 49–61.

Williams, R., and Sørensen, K. H. 2002. Shaping technology, guiding policy: concepts, spaces and tools. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Wynne, B. 2007. Dazzled by the mirage of influence? STS-SSK in multivalent registers of relevance. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(4), 491–503.

Østby, P. 1995. Flukten fra Detroit: bilens integrasjon i det norske samfunnet. Universitetet i Trondheim. Senter for teknologi og samfunn.
Published
2016-12-01
Section
Peer-Reviewed Articles