Etikk i praksis. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics (2018), 12(1), 23–41 |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5324/eip.v12i1.2239 |
Political control and journalist protests in Spanish public media in electoral campaigns: A decade of conflictCarme Ferré-Pavia
Media, Communication and Culture Department,
Communication Faculty, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carme.Ferre@uab.cat
For thirteen
consecutive years, Catalan public broadcasting journalists have protested
against the so-called coverage quotas established by Spanish electoral
regulations. According to those regulations, during election campaigns, broadcasters
are required to use a calculated number related to the proportion of votes cast
in the previous election to determine the amount of broadcast time they allot
to each party. Journalists have repeatedly and publicly complained about the quotas,
while simultaneously explaining the effects of the quotas to the audience and not
crediting authorship of this news. This paper undertakes an in-depth analysis
of the case and its historical roots from different angles: the protests, the journalists’
professional roles, the political parties’ strategies, the roles of the
regulatory boards and the initiatives taken by some professional organizations
and institutions. The theoretical framework focuses on the mistrust between the
political class and journalists in the context of a mediatized conflict with
ethical implications. The methodology includes extensive document examination,
news content analysis and interviews. The results indicate that the Spanish
political class has deemed the performance of the Catalan public broadcaster as
tending to equate political information with electoral spots controlled by
parties. The consequence of this has been an enduring conflict between
politicians and Catalan journalists that distances citizens from both of them. Keywords:
Spanish public media, media conflict, journalistic-political conflict, politics
and ethics in media. Introduction
For the first time in thirteen years of protests, some
Catalan public broadcasting channels1 tested the
action of not implementing the blocks
system in the campaign for the 26 June 2016 general election2.
The measure was very discreet, but television analysts noted that “the informative
services of TV3 [Catalonia Television] have achieved something with this action”
(Planas 2016, my translation). In May 2016, the Catalan Journalists’
Association (Catalonia is an autonomous region of Spain which has its own
institutions) announced that actions against what it considers to be the
political control of public media would continue3.
One year earlier, they had submitted a request to the European Court of Human
Rights to denounce the so-called electoral
blocks (quotas) in Spanish public media. The blocks are time-controlled
pieces of news reporting on political parties’ daily agenda during electoral
campaigns during the fifteen days before elections. It is a system that requires
journalists to adjust the length and order of news coverage to the parties’
parliamentary representation rather than news values.
Media ethics in political campaigns It
is assumed that media ethics cannot be mandated by government if the press is
to be truly free in democratic societies. In most countries, the journalistic
profession is a self-regulated field, in which observation, interpretation and
evaluation are considered to be journalism’s civic functions (Borden 2007).
Faith in the fairness
and accuracy of the news media has also dropped precipitously among regular
citizens. According to Pew (2011), whereas a clear majority (55%) of Americans
trusted the news media to “get their facts straight” in 1985, only one in four
Americans feel the same way now. Similarly, in 1985, 34% of Americans trusted
news organizations to deal fairly with all sides in “presenting the news dealing
with political and social issues”, but less than half that percentage (16%)
trusted them to do the same in 2011. According to the same July 2011 poll,
nearly two-thirds of respondents agreed that news organizations were
“politically biased in their reporting” (versus 45% in 1985) (Groeling 2013:
131). During the final weeks
of a campaign a substantial number of voters – often enough to swing an
election – have not yet made up their minds as to which candidate they will
select. These voters are looking to television news for information to help
make informed choices. But the information broadcast to the public in the final
weeks of the campaigns emphasized hype rather than substance (2005: 104).
Trust and dialogue in media messages Journalists’ and the media’s ethical principles of
independence and social responsibility were set out in the declaration by the
Commission on Freedom of the Press (1947), which stated that the press should
remain free from governmental or corporative pressures in order to serve
society. That set of principles is also considered fundamental by Cooper (1989)
and Lambeth (1986) in their proposals for the categorization of the universal
principles of journalistic ethics (Rodríguez,
Figueras, Mauri and Alsius 2013). Considering global media
ethics, some authors have defined the three universals, or values, as “a) the
quest for truth; b) the desire for responsibility; and c) a compulsion for free
expression” (Cooper and College 1990: 5).
As demonstrated in various ways, perceptions of the media are linked to
perceptions of government. Their fortune has declined together. This could
represent the decay of something more fundamental that affects people’s general
trust in society, but it also might represent the mutual destruction of
government officials and the media. As they attack and criticize each other,
they pull down evaluations of themselves and related societal institutions” (Bennet,
Rhine, Flickinger and Bennet 1999: 17). Analysis of the many empirical studies shows that, although media usage generally stimulates political participation, it is less clear when negative news will nullify this effect. Negative news may have not only short-term behavioural effects, but also effects on underlying attitudes such as trust in politicians, which may bare a sleeper effect on political behaviour only in the long term (Kleinnijenshuis, Van Hoof and Oegema 2006: 101).
Various authors assign the media responsibility for having an effect on participation that may be positive or negative, but rarely neutral. For many researchers, demobilization is connected to a lack of trust that reaches both individuals and institutions, and affects the media as institutions (Uslaner 1999); there is debate as to whether or not less trust leads to less participation (Ansolabehere and Iyengar 1995, Jeffres, Atkin and Neuendorf 2002). Considering the media as another social actor, the battle between the media and institutions can distance people from both at the same time. This paper will examine the roots of this political
and media conflict: first, by analysing
how the protests have been carried out; and second, by looking at the role
played by the political parties, journalists and institutions involved. The
study focuses on contextual elements in the Catalan case to assess the way in
which the journalists’ protests have evolved from their origins, and to observe
how the institutions involved (such as political parties, electoral boards,
broadcasting boards) have kept the conflict alive for thirteen years.
It is possible to find some studies that analyse journalists’ strikes, for example how citizens’ identify with newspaper strikes ( McCoy, Spratt and McCluskey 2003) and different protests in North America (Demers 2006, Neilson 2012, Cohen 2014), but none of them is involved with protests against electoral laws. Results
This section uses a
narrative approach to describe the results according to the three established objectives.
This approach was chosen to make it easier for readers to understand the conflict
– between a control on pluralism and journalistic ethics and freedom – in
context.
The protests started in 2003, when a request by the Catalan Journalists’ Association (CJA) to eliminate the blocks was ignored. In summer 1999, the CJA sent out a document entitled For a new public broadcasting model, which stated9: It is necessary to have media that guarantee information
that is plural, independent and designed to satisfy citizens’ interests before
any others. Secondly, public media are necessary to guarantee that the whole
population has access to radio and television services. Thirdly, they are also
necessary to guarantee the existence of public spaces that can transmit to
people an awareness that they are part of a collective group.
Today you will notice that not only are news pieces about the
referendum not ‘signed’ by journalists, but the entire news bulletin has not been
credited. This is TV3 staff’s protest against the rule determining the overall length
of these news pieces according to the political representativeness of the party
in question. The following news story, as well as those on the rest of the
campaign, has not been ‘signed’ by the journalists. This is a protest action
taken by TV3 staff due to the rule that sets the order and the length of these
news stories according to their political representation. We remind you, once again, that this summary news piece that we do
every day has not been ‘signed’ by our colleagues, who are protesting due to
the criteria established by the Catalan Broadcasting Corporation that establish
airtime limits for our work. This and the other news pieces you have watched in this programme were
not ‘signed’. This is a protest by the TV3 newsroom against the regulations
that set the time and order of campaign news pieces according to political
parties’ parliamentary representation and not according to newsworthiness
criteria.
On La nit al dia on 23 May the following statement was read after an interview: Political information is determined by airtime time ranges that impair our work. We also believe that, ultimately, these time ranges impair citizens’ right to have political issues reported in a less restricted way in these kinds of campaigns. That is why the newsroom is protesting and refuses to put its name to news pieces at this time. Attitude of professionals The journalists’ opinion is that the control imposed by the blocks goes against television parameters. In one of the interviews, Arderius says that the boredom and distance created by political parties contribute to losing viewers rather than gaining them: “The message is not getting to people. We have to think about TV formats that allow for greater flexibility”.
Freedom of programming must be respected and the public administration does not have the power to limit the length of news programmes or to enforce campaign activities being covered in them. [...] With the exception of free airtime for electoral propaganda, the Electoral Boards cannot intervene in the programming of the broadcast media, as long as the principles of political and social pluralism and the neutrality of the public media during the electoral period are respected.
We
deplore the fact that the criteria of neutrality, equality, plurality and
balance that must be part of an advanced democracy are being misinterpreted and
wrongly implemented through the system of blocks and pre-determined time and
order allotment in the public media. These criteria ignore informative
interests and the most basic professional principles of journalism. These
principles should not be foreign to self-proclaimed independent private
media either. ·
The blocks do not correspond to the
public interest. ·
The imposition of edited TV broadcasts
(given by the parties) denies people their right to information. ·
The blocks turn journalists into
mere transmitters. ·
The blocks make information
equivalent to propaganda because both are administered in the same way. ·
There is no legal stipulation for
the imposition of the blocks, and they infringe on constitutional rights. ·
The distribution of information
in blocks does not guarantee neutrality. It is instead the content of the information
that has to be neutral. ·
Regulatory mechanisms for
pluralism already exist: the inclusion of political parties in the management
of public media, the presence of parties in the daily programming schedules,
and the establishment of rules for free electoral propaganda during campaigns. It will no longer be obligatory to measure the minutes of each news
piece every day, nor will the order have to be determined according to
electoral representativeness. Nevertheless, in the global estimates of the
campaign, requiring some percentages to be obtained for electoral influence
remains unquestioned, as does the assumption that pluralism translates more or
less strictly into proportionality. To achieve more freedom, a board is needed whose
sole aim is not to represent the interests of the parties. The managers of
Catalan public media who have defended criteria of independence and informative
neutrality do not need to be overseen by political representatives, who are sometimes
the same people who are in charge of the corresponding electoral campaign.” We believe that a new perspective of progress in the professional
struggle against electoral blocks has begun. Given the strength of our last
mobilization, we must put pressure on political parties and boards so they stop
appealing to the false obligation to respect the Electoral Law, and we must ask
them to respect professional criteria applied to political information when
there are no campaigns. If there were still political representatives in any
media that threaten pluralism and the neutrality proclaimed in the laws, the
solution would not be to ask for “equal” distribution of the cake, eroding the
professionalism of those providing information, but instead to ask for a legal
reform that secured the degovernmentalization
and the depolitization of these
media. We are following the path of new regulations for local public channels, as
desired – and maybe soon to be achieved – by Catalan public media. We are
hoping to finally have them approved soon. Mediation by the institutions In accordance with its public function, the Broadcasting Council was very active as a mediator during the first years of the conflict. Preliminary meetings in 2006 between delegations from this Council and the CJA took place, and on 27 March they presented an agreement on Recommendations for the quality of information during electoral processes for the public providers of broadcasting communication services. The Council sought to overcome the rigidity of the electoral blocks and introduced a series of specific items to achieve consensus.
Again, as
we see in the report on pluralism in the campaign for the home rule referendum,
references to the so-called “signature strike” carried out by the journalists
at Televisió de Catalunya have been longer than others, leaving out information
on the electoral campaign.
The protest continues because the blocks system has not been totally removed. Carles Prats, TV3 news editor, is leading the campaign against the blocks and the political control of the public media (by the Public Media Work Group of the CJA). He believes that blocks are “a democratic anomaly, a remarkable aberration that helps discredit journalism and politics, making democracy weaker. Prior censorship does not guarantee pluralism but is a symptom of democratic immaturity”.
In the electoral campaign information system, trust would involve giving freedom to editors to organize the order and duration of news pieces; it would also mean trusting in pluralism to control institutions, which provide information on and oversee adherence to pluralistic information coverage. The Catalan Broadcasting Council report on pluralism in the 2016 General Election coverage in Catalonia found that TV3, which was not organized by blocks at the time, had the most balanced presence of political parties and representatives (CAC 2016: 245). This fact could be a starting point for the conflict to come to an end.
Notes
1 The broadcasting
channels were: Televisió de Catalunya, Catalunya Ràdio, Barcelona Televisió and
Badalona Comunicació. 2 National
general election to choose Spanish Parliament representatives. 3 The
announcement took place at the Second Symposium on Press Freedom in Lleida
(Catalonia, Spain). Available at
http://www.periodistes.org/ca/noticia/segona-edicio-del-simposi-sobre- 4 In February 2017, the public Spanish Television workers ran a protest
against the political control in the channel. 5 Electoral
campaigns in Spain last fifteen days and include news pieces in public media. 6 Protests have
been documented in the following elections: 06/11/2003 Catalan
Parliament elections coverage 14/03/2004 Spanish Parliament 18/06/2006 Referendum on
Catalan home rule 01/11/2006 Catalan
Parliament 27/05/2007 Local
governments and General Council of Aran (subregion of Catalonia with its own
language) 7 The list of
documents is annexed to the final references and concern the following
institutions: Consell de l’Audiovisual de Catalunya (Catalan Broadcasting Council, a
regulatory authority) Col·legi de Periodistes de
Catalunya (Catalan Journalists’ Association, in this article, CJA) Sindicat de Periodistes
(Journalists’ Union) Síndic de Greuges (Catalan
Ombudsman) Junta Electoral Provincial de
Barcelona (Barcelona Electoral Board) Junta Electoral Central
(Spanish Electoral Board) 8 The
representatives interviewed were: Rafael Jorba (member of the Catalan Broadcasting Council) Josep Carles Rius (head of
the CJA) Pilar Antillach (TV3
journalist and member of the CJA) Rosa Marqueta (TV3 news
editor) Manel Raya (TV3 news
editor) Ferran Requejo (member of
the Barcelona Electoral Board) Sofía Gandarias (Spanish
Electoral Board secretary) Manuel Delgado (delegate to
the Spanish Electoral Board) Carles Prats (TV3 news
editor and member of the CJA, leader of the campaign against electoral quotas
and political control over the media) 9 All the
documents and journalists’ quotations have been translated by the author. 10 Spanish,
Catalan and local broadcasting channels, including television and radio. 11 The TV3 news
shows analysed are TN Migdia (noon TV
news bulletin), TN Vespre (evening TV
news bulletin) and La nit al dia (late-night
TV news bulletin). 12
On 11 March 2004, a terrorist attack took place on Madrid local trains similar
to the attacks on 9/11/2001 in New York.
References Almiron, N., Capurro, M. and
Santcovsky, P. (2010a) Los bloques electorales en los medios públicos del
Estado español: una excepción en Europa. Quaderns
del CAC, 34, 13(1), pp. 95−102. Almiron, N., Capurro, M. and Santcovsky, P. (2010b)
The Regulation of Public Broadcasters’ News
Coverage of Political Actors in Ten European Union Countries. Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(1), pp. 205−236. Ansolabehere, S. and Iyengar, S. (1995)
Going negative: how political advertisements shrink and polarize the
electorate. New York: Free Press. Ariely, G.
(2015) Does Commercialized Political Coverage Undermine Political Trust?
Evidence Across European Countries. Journal
of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(3), pp. 438−455. CrossRef Baum, M. and Groeling, T. (2009) Shot by the
messenger: partisan cues and public opinion regarding national security and
war. Political Behaviour, 31,
pp.157−186. CrossRef Bennet,
S. E., Rhine, S., Flickinger, R. and Bennet, L. (1999) Video Malaise Revisited:
Public Trust in the Media and Governemnt. The
Harvard International Journal of Press Politics, 4(4), pp. 8–23. CrossRef Berganza, R., Herrero, B. and Carratalà, A. (2016) Distrust
of Spanish journalists in public institutions based on the study of organizational
factors. Disertaciones, 9(1).
Retrieved February 01, 2017 from http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/ index.php/disertaciones Bermúdez,
N. A. (2012) Effects of social media on
individual voting (Doctoral dissertation, Gonzaga University). Washington: Department
of Communication and Leadership, Gonzaga University. Borden, S. L. (2007) Journalism as practice. Macintyre, virtue ethics and the press. Michigan:
Ashgate Publishing. Brants, K., De Vreese, C.
H., Möller, J. and Van Praag, P. (2010) The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust
between Politicians and Journalists. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), pp. 25−40. CrossRef CAC/Catalan Broadcasting Council (2016) Informe específic
de pluralisme a la televisió i a la ràdio durant la campanya de les eleccions
generals 2016. Retrieved February 01, 2017, from
http://www.cac.cat/pfw_files/cma/ actuacions/2016_INFORME_ELECCIONS_GENERALS.pdf Carrillo, N. (2012) El
xou nostrat. L’infoentreteniment en el contingut i la recepció del periodisme
electoral a Catalunya (eleccions de 2008 i 2010) (Doctoral dissertation, Autonomous University of Barcelona).
Bellaterra: UAB. Carrillo, N.
and Ferré-Pavia, C. (2013) Infotainment in news reports: the case of the 2010 Catalan elections. Catalan Journal of Communication and
Cultural Studies, 5(1), pp. 3–17. CrossRef Ceron, A. (2015) Internet, News, and Political Trust: The Difference Between Social Media
and Online Media Outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, pp. 487–503. CrossRef Chanley,
V., Rudolph, T. and Rhan, W. (2000) The Origin and Consequences of Public Trust
in Government. Public Opinion Quaterly,
64(3), pp. 239–256. CrossRef Cohen,
N. (2014) The Broken Table: The Detroit Newspaper Strike and the State of
American Labor. Labour, 74, pp. 377–379. Commission on Freedom of
the Press (1947) A free and responsible
press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cooper, T. (Ed.). (1989) Communications ethics and global change.
New York: Longman. Cooper,
T. and College, E. (1990) Comparative International Media Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 5(1), pp.
3–14. CrossRef Demers,
F. (2006) The Fundamental Role Played by Unionism in the Self-Structuring of
Professional Journalists from Québec. Canadian
Journal of Communication, 31(3), pp. 659–674. CrossRef De Vreese, C. H. (2005) The spiral of cynicism
reconsidered. European Journal of
Communication, 20, pp. 283–301. CrossRef De Vreese, C. H. and Elenbaas,
M. (2008) Media in the game of politics: Effects of strategic
metacoverage on political cynicism. International
Journal of Press Politics, 13, pp. 285–309. CrossRef EFE-Eldiario.es (2015) El Tribunal de Estrasburgo rechaza
una denuncia contra los bloques electorales. Retrieved November 03, 2015, from
http://www.eldiario.es/cultura/Tribunal-Estrasburgo-rechaza-denuncia
electorales_0_409809552.html Elenbaas, M. and De Vreese, C.
H. (2008) The effects of strategic news on political cynicism
and vote choice among young voters. Journal
of Communication, 58, pp. 550–567. CrossRef Esser,
F. and Pfetsch, B. (2016) Comparing
Political Communication: An Update. Working paper, 89. Zurich and Berlin:
National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR). Ferré-Pavia, C. (Ed.) (2013) Infoentretenimiento.
El formato imparable de la era del espectáculo. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Ferré-Pavia, C. (Ed.) (2014) El uso de las redes sociales. Ciudadanía, política y comunicación.
Bellaterra: Communication Institute-InCom UAB. Ferrer,
L. (2007) Blocs electorals? Sí, gràcies. Retrieved September
09, 2015, from http://v60news.blogspot.com/2007/05/blocs-electorals- García Mahamut, R. and Rallo Lombarte, A. (2013) Neutralidad y pluralismo de los medios de comunicación en
las campañas electorales. La reforma de la LOREG en 2011. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 98, pp. 201–240. Gnisci, A., Van Dalen, A. and
Di Conza, A. (2014) Interviews in a Polarized
Television Market: The Anglo-American Watchdog Model Put to the Test. Political
Communication, 31, pp. 112–130. CrossRef Grabe, M. E. and Bucy, E. P. (2009) Image Bite
Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. CrossRef Greenland,
K. (2013) Negotiating Self-presentation, Identity, Ethics, Readership and
Privacy in the LIS Blogosphere: A Review of the Literature. Australian Academic and Research Libraries,
44(4), pp. 217–225. CrossRef Groeling, T. (2013) Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and
Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.
Annual Review of Political Science, 16, pp. 129–151. CrossRef Gross,
K., Aday, S. and Brewer, P. (2004). A Panel Study of Media Effects on Political
and Social Trust after September 11, 2001. The
Harvard International Journal of Press Politics, 9(4), pp. 497–3. CrossRef Hehman, E., Graber, E. C., Hoffman, L. H. and
Gaertner, S. L. (2012) Warmth and competence: a content
analysis of photographs depicting American presidents. Psychology of Popular
Media Culture, 1, pp. 46–52. CrossRef Henderson,
J. (2013) Searching for Ethics in Social Media. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(3), pp. 217–219. CrossRef Hsin-Hsuan,
L., Van Dolen, W. and Kolk, A. (2013) On the Role of Social Media in the
'Responsible' Food Business: Blogger Buzz on Health and Obesity. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), pp. 695–707. CrossRef Jeffres, L., Atkin, D. and Neuendorf, K. (2002) A
Model Linking Community Activity and Communication with Political Attitudes and
Involvement in Neighbourhoods. Political
Communication, 19, pp. 387–421. CrossRef Khaquli,
I. and Esipisu, M. (2009) Eyes of Democracy: The Media and Elections. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. Kleinnijenshuis,
J., Van Hoof, A. and Oegema, D. (2006) Negative News and the Sleeper Effect or
Distrust. The Harvard International
Journal of Press Politics, 11(2), pp. 86–104. CrossRef Kleppinger,
H. (2000) The Declining Image of the German Political Elite. The Harvard International Journal of Press
Politics, 5(4), pp. 71–80. CrossRef Lambeth, E. (1986) Committed journalism. An ethics for the
profession. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press. Lee, T. T. (2005)
The Liberal Media Myth Revisited: An
Examination of Factors Influencing Perceptions of Media Bias. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,
49(1), pp. 43–64. CrossRef Lowry, D. T. (2008) Network TV news framing of good
vs. bad economic news under Democrat and Republican presidents: a lexical
analysis of political bias. Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, pp. 483–498. CrossRef Merrill, J. C. (1989) The dialectic in journalism: Toward responsible use of press freedom.
Baton Rouge-London: Lousiana State University Press. Min,
Y. (2004) News Coverage of Negative Political Campaigns. An Experimental of Negative
Campaigns Effects on Turnout and Candidate Preference. The Harvard International Journal of Press Politics, 9(4), pp. 95–111. CrossRef Montero
Vargas, D. (2015) Pluralismo informativo
y televisión en campañas electorales en España 2011-2015 (Master degree
work, Autonomous University of Barcelona). Bellaterra: UAB. McCoy,
K., Spratt, M. and McCluskey, M. R. (2003) Media effects in public opinion
about a newspaper strike. Journalism and Mass
Communication Quarterly, 80(2), pp. 391–409. CrossRef T.Global Media Journal, – Journalists Strike Online: Visibility, Field and ‘The Huffington Post’. Pew
Research Center (2011) Press Widely Criticized, But Trusted More than Other
Information Sources Views of the News Media: 1985–2011. Retrieved February 22,
2016, from
http://www.people- Pfetsch,
B., Maurer, P., Mayerhöffer, E. and Moring, T. (2014) A Hedge between
Keeps Friendship Green-Concurrence and Conflict between Politicians and
Journalists in Nine European Democracies In Comparing
Political Communication across Time and Space. New Studies in an Emerging Field,
eds. Canel, M. J. and Voltmer, K., pp. 172–191. New York: Springer. Planas, M./Ara
(2016) Què ha passat amb els blocs electorals a TV3? Retrieved
June 15, 2016, from www.ara.cat/eleccions26j/Que-passat-blocs-electorals-TV3_0_1595840466.html Porto, M. (2007) TV News and Political Change in
Brazil: The Impact of Democratization on TV Globo’s Journalism. Journalism, 8(4), pp. 381–402. CrossRef Ramsden, G. (1996) Media Coverage of Issues and
Candidates: What Balance is Appropriate in a Democracy? Political Science Quarterly, 111(1), pp. 65–81. CrossRef Rawnsley, G. and Gong, Q.
(2011) Political Communications in Democratic Taiwan: The Relationship between
Politicians and Journalists. Political
Communication, 28(3), pp. 323–340. CrossRef
Rodríguez, R., Figueras, M.,
Mauri, M. And Alsius, S. (2013) How
Dominant are Official Sources in Shaping Political News Coverage in Spain? The
Perceptions of Journalists and Citizens. Journal
of Mass Media Ethics, 28, pp. 103–118. CrossRef Schuck, A. R., Boomgaarden, H. G. and De Vreese, C.
H. (2013) Cynics all around? The impact of election news on political cynicism
in comparative perspective. Journal of Communication,
63, pp. 287–311. CrossRef Shah,
D. (1998) Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust and Television Use: An Individual-Level
Assessment of Social Capital. Political
Psychology, 19(3), pp. 469–496. CrossRef Shehata, A. (2014) Game frames, issue frames, and mobilization:
Disentangling the effects of frame exposure and motivated news attention on
political cynicism and engagement. International
Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, pp. 157–177. CrossRef Terribas, M. (2004) La desaparició del periodisme: senyal realitzat i blocs
electorals. Comunicació21, 4, pp. 78–79. Tomàs,
X. (2007) Per a què serveixen els blocs electorals en campanya? Retrieved
November 11, 2007, from http://xtomas.bloc.cat Uslaner,
E. (1998) Social Capital, Television and the ‘Mean World’: Trust, Optimism and
Civic Participation. Political Psychology,
19(3), pp. 441–467. CrossRef Uslaner,
E. (1999) Trust but Verify: Social Capital and Moral Behavior. Social Science Information, 38, pp. 29–55. CrossRef Vallès, J. M. (Ed.)
(2008) Actituds polítiques i comportament electoral a Catalunya. Retrieved May 06, 2008, from http://exteriors.gencat.cat Van Dalen, A., Albæk, E. and De Vreese, C. H.
(2011) Suspicious
minds: Explaining political cynicism among political journalists in Europe.
European Journal of Communication, 26(2), pp. 147–162. CrossRef Zabaleta,
I. (2000) Politics and television news in Spain In Contemporary Spanish Cultural Studies, eds. Jordan, B. and
Morgan-Tamosunas, R., pp. 159–169. London: Edward Arnold Publishers, New York:
Oxford University Press. Documents
referred to and analysed Col·legi de Periodistes de Catalunya (1999) Per un nou model
de ràdio i televisió pública. Col·legi de Periodistes de Catalunya (2003) Per la reforma dels mitjans de comunicació
públics. Col·legi de Periodistes de Catalunya, Asociación de la
Prensa de Madrid, Colexio de Xornalista de Galicia (2007) Document that claims
for respect to professional criteria in electoral campaigns. Col·legi de Periodistes de Catalunya (2008) Manifest en defensa d’uns mitjans públics
independents. Col·legi de Periodistes de Catalunya/Mir, J.; Pareja, C.;
Segura, G. (2007) Dictamen sobre el dret
a la informació i els blocs d’informació electoral als mitjans públics. Comitè
Professional de Catalunya Ràdio i Comitè Professional de TVC (2005) Document that
claims for the depolitization of Catalan Broadcasting Media System. Consell de l’Audiovisual de Catalunya (2006) Informes específics sobre el pluralisme a la
ràdio i la televisió en el referèndum de l’Estatut i les eleccions al Parlament. Consell de l’Audiovisual de Catalunya (2007) Informe específic de pluralisme durant la
campanya de les eleccions municipals 2007. Consell de l’Audiovisual de Catalunya (2007) Recomanacions sobre la qualitat de la
informació en els processos electorals per als prestadors públics de serveis de
comunicació audiovisual. Junta Electoral Central (2006) Recurs del PSC contra acord de la JEP sobre criteris de la CCRTV a les
eleccions de l’Estatut d’autonomia 2006. Junta Electoral Provincial (2007) Recurs de CiU contra acords de la CCRTV sobre criteris de les eleccions
municipals 2007. Sindicat de Periodistes de Catalunya (2006) Document sobre blocs electorals i la nova
llei de CCRTV. Sindicat de Periodistes de
Catalunya (2007) Balanç de la mobilització contra els blocs electorals.
|