"I Will Write a Letter and Change the World". The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative

Authors

  • Erlend Andre Tveiten Hermansen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v3i2.2164

Keywords:

NGOs, issue formation, climate policy, REDD , Norway

Abstract

In September 2007 two Norwegian NGOs wrote a letter to leading Norwegian politicians urging them to establish a climate initiative for protecting rainforests. Two months later, at the United Nations climate summit in Bali, Norway committed to donate three billion NOK annually to prevent tropical deforestation, making Norway the leading global donor in what has become the REDD+ mechanism (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). This article provides a detailed analysis of the making of the rainforest initiative, placing particular emphasis on the knowledge base of the initiative, most notably a decisive letter. Close contact with policy makers in the process ensured legitimacy and credibility for the proposal. Important for the initiative’s rapid progression was that it came in the middle of the run-up to the negotiations of a cross-political climate settlement in the Norwegian Parliament. The rainforest initiative became one of the hottest proposals in the climate policy ‘bidding war’ between the government and the opposition. All these events must be seen against the background of 2007 being a year when public concern and media coverage about climate issues peaked. Politicians were under pressure to act, and the rainforest proposal’s perfect fit with the Norwegian climate mitigation main approach of pursuing large-scale cost-effective emission cutbacks abroad made it pass swiftly through the governmental machinery. In conclusion, the article suggests the metaphor of the perfect storm to explain how the NGOs exploited a situation which made the rainforest initiative an indispensable part of Norway’s climate policy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aasen, M. 2015. The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway. Climate Policy, 1-18.

Asdal, K. 1998. Knappe ressurser? Økonomenes grep om miljøfeltet. Universitetsforlaget.

Asdal, K. 2011. Politikkens natur – naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget.

Asdal, K. 2014. From climate issue to oil issue: offices of public administration, versions of economics, and the ordinary technologies of politics. Environment and Planning A, 46(9), 2110-2124.

Bortne, Ø., P. Selle and K. Strømsnes. 2002. Miljøvern uten grenser?. Gyldendal akademisk.

Climate Funds Update, 2015. Contributions to the Multilateral Funds and Bilateral Initiatives. Climate Funds Update. [Accessed 4 January 2016, data last updated November 2015].

Dryzek, J. S., Downes, D., Hunold, C., Schlosberg, D., and Hernes, H. K. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press.

George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

Grendstad, G., P. Selle, K. Strømsnes and Ø. Bortne. 2006. Unique environmentalism: A comparative perspective. Springer Science & Business Media.

Gullberg, A. T. and T. Skodvin 2011. Cost Effectiveness and Target Group Influence in Norwegian Climate Policy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 34 (2), 123-142.

Gullberg, A. T. 2011. Access to climate policy-making in the European Union and in Norway. Environmental Politics, 20 (4), 464-484.

Hermansen, E. A. T., and S. Kasa. 2014. Climate policy constraints and NGO entrepreneurship: the story of Norway’s leadership in REDD+ financing. CGD Climate Forest Paper Series, 15, 389.

Hermansen, E. A. T. 2015. Policy window entrepreneurship: the backstage of the world’s largest REDD+ initiative. Environmental Politics, 24 (6), 932-950.

IPCC 2007a. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

IPCC 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

IPCC 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

IPCC 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

Kasa, S. 2013. The Second-Image Reversed and Climate Policy: How International Influences Helped Changing Brazil’s Positions on Climate Change. Sustainability, 5 (3), 1049-1066.

Kingdon, J. W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Longman.

Norad 2014. Real-Time Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative. Synthesising Report 2007-2013. Norad.

Reinertsen, H. and K. Asdal. 2010. Fra naturfredning til klimakamp: Norges Naturvernforbund 1914-2014. Senter for teknologi, innovasjon og kultur (TIK).

Reitan, M. 1998. Ecological Modernisation and ‘Realpolitik’: Ideas, Interests and Institutions. Environmental Politics, 7 (2), 1-26.

SCN 2007. Ikke for sent: Redd regnskogen — redd klimaet! Letter from The Norwegian Society for the Conservation of Nature/Friends of the Earth Norway and the Rainforest Foundation Norway.

Stern, N. H. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.

Sundqvist, G., I. Bohlin, E. A. T. Hermansen and S. Yearley. 2015. Formalization and separation: A systematic basis for interpreting approaches to summarizing science for climate policy. Social Studies of Science, 45 (3), 416-440.

Sølhusvik, L. 2012. Kristin Halvorsen: Gjennomslag. Cappelen Damm.

Tellmann, S. M. 2012. The constrained influence of discourses: the case of Norwegian climate policy. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 734-752.

Tjernshaugen, A., B. Aardal and A. T. Gullberg. 2011. Det første klimavalget? Miljø– og klimaspørsmålenes plass ved valget i 2009. In Aardal, B. (ed.). Det politiske landskap. En studie av stortingsvalget i 2009. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, 291–362.

van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Olivier, J. G., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jackson, R. B., Collatz, G. J., and Randerson, J. T. 2009. CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature geoscience, 2(11), 737-738.

Yearley, S. 2005. Cultures of Environmentalism: Empirical Studies in Environmental Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

Issue

Section

Special Issue Peer Reviewed Articles