|

| Editors in charge |
 |
Anne Katharine Dahl, NTNU |
 |
Gunnar Sand, SINTEF |
| Editor: |
 |
Åse Dragland, SINTEF |
| Editorial coordinator |
 |
Nina E. Tveter, NTNU |
|
A geological headache is over
 |
|
This is what Tellnes anorthite looks like, enlarged
50 times. The pictures have been taken with double polarized light
through a thin plate.
Photo: Henrik Schiellerup
|
After eight intense months in a laboratory in Australia, NTNU geologist
Henrik Schiellerup had enough -material to prove that the rock known as
anorthite is formed in the crust of the earth, and not in the mantle.
This could prove to be important for the extraction of the super-material
titanium.
By Nina E. Tveter
Let us compress 4.5 billion years into a couple of hours. Imagine that
we are listening to a symphony. Violins, cellos, trumpets, horns, percussion
instruments, clarinets, double-bass and triangles all these make
their contribution to the musical composition. Waves of harmonies as well
as more demanding sounds sharpen our awareness. The clarinets tap away
at the slowly-dying theme, the violins whip up rainstorms, and the oboes
force out thin strips of notes under pressure. The kettledrums herald
the greatest volcanic eruption of all times, and the triangle outlines
its message clear as crystal. The theme is then investigated by other
instruments in other keys. Many instruments have a lot to say, and they
frequently discuss it with their co-players, while some others only make
a single contribution. If we stretch this analogy a bit, we can say that
it gives us a sense of how the minerals and rocks of the earth have been
created. Some are formed in the upper layers of the mantle, others in
the lower layer of the crust of the earth, and some in the upper layer
of the crust from the remains of deep-layer rocks or in chemical processes
involving air and water.
Many types of rock have also been through several processes of transformation,
as continental plates have moved towards each other and rock-flakes have
been pressed back down towards the mantle only to re-emerge on the surface
with a new personality. Most rocks are the result of processes involving
several geological eras just as most instruments in the orchestra
take part in creating the music of each movement. The triangle, however,
seldom performs more than once in a symphony, and this is also the case
for a few rocks. One of these is called anorthite, and it has created
so many headaches for geologists around the world that its formation has
been labelled the anorthite problem.
Accepted by the journal Nature
 |
|
Tellnes in Rogaland, Norway, is one of the largest
solid-rock mines extracting titanium in the world. The mine produces
about seven per cent of total global production.
Photo: Henrik Schiellerup
|
Large massifs of anorthite were formed exclusively in the period from
2500 million to 900 million years ago (in the Proterozic era). How, why
and where they formed around the globe has been a hot topic for discussion
among geological researchers for many decades. Was this species of rock
formed in the mantle or in the crust? And why are there so many ilmenite
deposits in the anorthite?
Research student Henrik Schiellerup in the Department of Geology and Mineral
Resources Engineering at NTNU became interested in the anorthite problem.
Funded by the Research Council of Norway, Schiellerup travelled to Monash
University in Australia, where he studied the isotope combination in the
exotic elements osmium (Os) and rhenium (Re) in anorthite rocks from Rogaland,
Norway. He used advanced techniques and equipment possessed by only a
few universities in the world.
After eight months in the laboratory, Schiellerup finally succeeded in
establishing that this rock is actually formed in the lower region of
the earths crust, and not in the mantle as most geologists have
claimed. The result is so interesting that the prestigious international
journal Nature accepted Schiellerups article on this subject last
autumn, with NTNUs Professor Tore Prestvik as co-author. Prestvik
was Schiellerups supervisor for the doctoral work which led to these
conclusions. Other co-authors of the article are Brian Robins at the University
of Bergen, Rune B. Larsen at NGU, and David D. Lambert from the Australian
university.
Why is it so important to know whether this rock has its origin
twenty or two hundred kilometres below the surface of the earth?
In addition to all the scientific benefits which result from having as
many pieces of the jig-saw puzzle which comprises the geological
development of the earth in place as possible, Schiellerup foresees economic
possibilities for mining and for business:
There are deposits of the mineral ilmenite in anorthite. We can
extract titanium from ilmenite (Ti and TiO2). Titanium is a modern raw
material which is used in, for instance, white paint, aeroplane engines,
frying pans, prostheses, plastic, paper, cosmetics, pills and also for
military purposes. Titaniums melting point is high and it has attractive
strength-weight characteristics. It is also resistant to corrosion, he
explains.
The worlds two largest solid-rock mines which extract titanium are
Lac Tio in Canada and Tellnes in Rogaland, Norway. The latter alone is
responsible for about seven per cent of total global production. Norway
is the fourth largest titanium ore producer in the world.
Easier to choose the best
 |
|
Research at NTNU shows that anorthite rock is
not formed in the mantle, as was previously believed, but in the
lower part of the Earths crust. Exact knowledge about formation
processes makes it easier for the mining companies to find deposits
which have the desired qualities.
|
Schiellerup explains that even if the deposits in Rogaland and in Canada
are huge and very rich in ilmenite, the quality of the ilmenite is very
varied. Knowledge of formation processes makes it easier for the mining
companies to find deposits of the desired quality.
In the future the extraction of titanium and TiO2 from ilmenite
will be able to take place using two methods. The older method, the so-called
sulphate process, does not demand much in terms of the quality of the
raw material, other than that that it should not contain too much chrome.
But this method results in some undesired by-products, such as sulphuric
acid and iron sulphate. The chloride process is less hard on the environment.
The drawback is that this method demands more of the raw material (the
ore).
Traces of unwanted elements such as magnesium create problems for this
method. If we had enough information about where in the Earth the anorthite
was formed, along with knowledge about the geological processes which
are linked to the anorthites, then the mining companies and the smelteries
would be able to select the most appropriate qualities of material, and
the best methods for the extraction of titanium. As a result, they would
be able to obtain a better return on the raw material.
|
|